The Facts About Cash Value Life Insurance - What Suzie Orman Won't Tell You About Buying Insurance

For years now, made for TV experts and infomercialespecially for investors who depend on market returns
wizards have been dispensing financial advice toto provide retirement income, and create legacy
millions of eager Americans. Celebrity advisors such asassets. The stock market in 2008-2009 provides a
Suzie Orman and Dave Ramsey for example, utilizerecent example of how difficult it is to create returns
the television media, to provide consumers advice onwhen they are needed the most. "In the 12 months
everything from credit issues and home mortgages tofollowing the stock market's peak in October 2007,
stock market investing and life insurance. As a result,more than $1 trillion worth of stock value held in 401(k)s
many of these advisors have amassed thousands ofand other "defined-contribution" plans was wiped out,
devoted followers of their brand of financial wisdomaccording to the Boston College research center.
while making income from the sale of books, CD's,Whether it is 401K shares or individual mutual funds, all
newsletters, etc. There is nothing wrong with utilizinginvestors are subject to market risk and timing near
the media to build your "brand" and increase yourthe end of their working careers which can still blow
visibility. In fact, this is an accepted and highlytheir savings and future retirement plans.
successful technique for building a financial servicesWill you need Life Insurance?
business. However, the information provided by manyWhat Suzie Orman, Dave Ramsey and others are
of these "experts" often reflects a certain philosophicalmissing is that the arguments about the rate of return
bias that can be short sighted, self serving and notyou can get from cash value insurance are completely
reflective of individual financial circumstances. Thesecondary. The main reason to own cash-value life
hallmark of good financial advice is thatinsurance is the permanent nature of the coverage.
recommendations are always based on conducting aWe face greater financial risks during our retirement
thorough investigation to determine an individual'syears than at any other point in our lifetime. Even if
current financial situation and future plans. Only with theyou can afford to self insure, many of these financial
knowledge of a client's current assets and resources,risks can be managed most effectively through
investment risk tolerance and priorities for the futureowning life insurance and by shifting the risk to an
can a financial advisor be sure that theirinsurance carrier rather than assuming all the risk
recommendations are right for any individual. Withoutyourself. The disadvantages of not having life
this knowledge, all financial advice is generic and thusinsurance at retirement are far greater than any
may not be right for everyone.potential benefit gained by self insuring. Since life
No where is this type of one size fits all advice moreinsurance is cheaper and easier to purchase when you
prevalent then in the belief that when it comes toare young and healthy it makes more sense to lock in
buying life insurance, term coverage is always best.fixed insurance premium rates and provide lifelong
Suzie Orman, Dave Ramsey and others, havefinancial protection for your loved ones. In addition, life
expressed the opinion that consumers, in all casesinsurance can not only protect one from the risks of
would be better off buying low cost term life insurancepremature death, but can also provide protection from
versus the more expensive cash value permanent lifethe risks of outliving your retirement savings, help pay
policies. They routinely advice listeners to purchaseestate taxes, and replace lost pension income. With
less expensive term insurance and utilize the moneymore and more people living into their 80s, 90s and
saved on costlier permanent life insurance to invest inbeyond, the real fact is that lifetime insurance
the stock market mutual funds, IRA's or other marketcoverage cannot practically or affordably be
driven products. In the insurance industry, this ismaintained with term insurance.
referred to as (BTID) "Buy Term and Invest thePrice versus Value
Difference". Proponents of the "BTID" philosophy argueMany people are familiar with the concepts of
that cash value policies are not sound long termhomeownership. In general, most Americans accept
investments because life insurance companies investthe financial principal of homeownership without
too conservatively in order to generate the returnsquestion. The principal that owning is always better
guaranteed to cash value policy holders. The "Buythan renting is part of the American cultural legacy.
Term and Invest the Difference" crowd advocate aWhy because it is about value and not the price. Well
more aggressive investment approach for premiumthis same principal can be applied relatively easily to
dollars beyond what life insurance companies canowning a cash value policy. The example below
expect from the conservative markets. They alsoshows you how closely buying and owning cash value
argue that you will only need life insurance for a shortlife insurance resembles buying and owning a home:o
period of time anyway, just until you have accumulatedYou pay more up front to purchase a house and to
enough through debt consolidation, savings andbuy Cash Value Life Insurance.o They both build equity
investments to live comfortably. Orman on her websiteover time and free of income taxes.o After a number
explains, "If you are smart with the money you haveof years owners usually can get all their money back
today and you get rid of your mortgages, car loanswith a reasonable interest return.o You can access
and credit card debt and put money into retirementyour home equity and policy equity only buy selling or
plans you don't need insurance 30 years from now toby taking out a loan against themo If you take a loan
protect your family when you die".against them, you can use that money tax-free.o You
Clearly eliminating personal debt and investing wiselydon't pay income taxes on the value of the house or
are worthwhile and important financial goals forthe CV Life Insurance until you sell them.o Both a
everyone and should be given the highest priority inhome and cash value life insurance are considered
any financial recommendations. On the other hand, iffinancial assets.
you are unable to achieve a debt free lifestyle orAdvantages of Cash Value Life Insurance versus
realize substantial market returns, you run the risk ofTerm Insurance
losing your insurance protection due to premiumBenefits of Ownership Cash Value Life Term Life
increases or becoming ineligible to qualify for coveragePremiums that never increase over time Yes No
when it is needed most.Your cash values accumulate tax deferred. Yes No
Real World ExperienceThe cash accumulated in your policy can provide you
The "Buy Tem and Invest the Difference" conceptwith atax-free income in retirement. Yes No
makes sense until you examine it's it closely andCreates a liquid 'Emergency Fund' Yes No
compare it with the real world experiences of lifeConsidered asset when applying for bank loans Yes
insurance buyers. Looking at the experiences, of manyNo
policy holders who buy term life protection with theGuarantees - Only Life Insurance and Annuities
intent to invest their premium savings, we see why thisguarantee yourinvestment principle Yes No
strategy may not be practical for the averageCash values can be accessed income tax-free and
consumer. Most consumers are neither experiencedpenalty free priorto age 59½. Yes No
nor consistent market investors nor do they have theCash value life insurance is not attachable by creditors.
time and discipline necessary to become successfulYes No
market players. The results are that most consumersCash value life insurance doesn't count as an asset
eventually buy term insurance and never invest thewhen you applyfor college financial aide. Yes No
difference. Or in other words "Buy Term and SpendConclusion
the Difference".The success of people like Dave Ramsey and others
A 2003 Harris Interactive study found that 77% ofin shaping the debate over term versus permanent
more than 1,000 Americans surveyed had bought terminsurance is largely based on unrealistic assumptions
insurance as a way to save for long-term financialand misconceptions about the benefits of cash value
goals. But only a third of them could identify thoselife insurance. Their advice while otherwise sound,
goals, and just 14% invested all the money they savedwhen it comes to buying life insurance does not reflect
by buying the term policy. By contrast, 17% spent it all.the realities of the experiences and habits of the
According to 2007 Dalbar Report', investor resultsAmerican consumer. A larger question is why are so
over a twenty-year period (1987-2006), showed thatmany people touting the benefits of "BTID", including
the average investor only earned 4.3% during a periodinsurance carriers like, Primerica, Inc., (Division of
where the S&P 500 yielded 11.8%, And, this wasCitigroup), which bases it's entire marketing strategy on
during one of the best bull markets on record. And, itthe BTID philosophy. In my opinion, the answer is two
doesn't include the 2008 stock market downturn norfold. One, the insurance industry has done a poor job
does it consider investor fees or expenses paid.of educating the public regarding their options. Two,
Clearly many people are being misled when it comesterm insurance is a highly profitable and less risky
to actual returns experienced by the average investor.product for all life insurance carriers. Think about it!
The average investor never realizes higher interestThey are only on the hook for a short period of
gains on their premium savings and as a result of "time-minimum of one year and a maximum of 30
BTID" generally find themselves without life insuranceyears. There are no additional cash values obligations
coverage because they can no longer afford theor potential dividend payouts to be accounted for.
higher term premiums or no longer qualify forAdditionally, according to industry statistics, only 1-2%
coverage.of all term policies actually pay out a death claim to the
IRS Taxes:policyholder. This suggests that the majority of policy
Another reason to question the "BTID" philosophy isholders either lapse their term contracts before the
that even where consumers are successful inend of the policy period and thus receive nothing for
achieving higher investment returns from mutual fundsthe years of premium payments made nor retain any
earning, all such returns are subject to capital gainsof the insurance protection from the policy. In addition,
taxes.companies like Primerica, also earn additional fees and
Insurance buyers must factor in taxes whencommissions from the sale of their mutual funds to
comparing the guaranteed returns from cash value lifepolicy holders. This makes "BTID" a good marketing
insurance versus mutual funds shares. The intereststrategy for the certain insurance companies but not
returns on mutual funds gains are subject to as muchnecessarily good for consumers. Consumers should
as, 25-38% in taxes, depending on one's income taxconsider the total amount of insurance coverage they
bracket. In addition, mutual fund gains must also bewill need to protect their families, and for how long they
adjusted to account for the investment fees thesewill realistically need the coverage, before purchasing
fund providers charge share holders for theany life insurance. The most important life insurance
opportunity to invest. These fees will further erode anybuying strategy is to make sure your family has the
positive market gains achieved. The question is what isright amount of coverage, whether that becomes
the true rate of return on mutual fund sharesterm, permanent or a combination of both. However, in
compared to guaranteed returns found in most cashmy opinion, owning a cash value life insurance policy is
value policies?a better value than buying term insurance as long as
Market Volatility:you can afford it. If you need life insurance and can
The BTID concept presupposes you will have noget comparable returns to the market without the risks,
further use for life insurance because you will havemore guarantees, tax free income, plus other benefits,
generated sufficient market returns through this morethen why not buy cash value life insurance?
aggressive investment strategy which will out paceConsumers should not be fooled into accepting
any potential cash values generated throughsimplistic advice such as "buy term and invest the
conservative returns on whole life. However, we knowdifference" just because it comes from someone with
the stock market can be a tricky thing to predicta TV show.